Archive for the ‘grain’ Category

Mountain Goat Saga – An update!

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

I’ve been and tasted a sixpack with the brewer. The six were consistent, though I thought I could smell one that was distinctively better, I got Dave to switch them around while I wasn’t looking, so that I could re-sniff and try to identify the glass which held what I thought was the superior beer. I narrowed it down to two, sniffed again, and again, then selected…………………………………………… and was incorrect.

While I’ve had a shit experience with Steam Ale, I can be certain that there is not any fault in the product itself, and the quality control is 100% Goat. For the rancid stubbies, I point the finger at poor handling somewhere along the lines. As for the style of the beer, who knows. The Hightail is still lovely, and if the IPA they release in glass is anywhere near as glorious as it was on tap last Friday night, I’m sure the Goats will retain my business.

Even if I reckon the Steam Ale is a sellout, that’s a style thing – not a fault, the IPA and Hightail are still A-Ok with me. You have my sincere apologies Dave & Cam. Keep up the good work!

Mountain Goat saga continues….

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

I received a response to the email which I previously posted from Mountain Goat. I’ll publish it once I’ve informed them that I’m publishing what they say.  It was positive, so much so it’s given me reason and optimism enough to again try Steam Ale, this time in the presence of my mother who is a beer taster of renown, who usually comes out with detailed descriptions such as; “ooh I like that” or the alternative; “I don’t like it.”

As an update, I did try a pot of Steam Ale at the Royston and thought it was pretty darn good. Anyhow, here’s the results from the six-pack I’ll taste over the next day or two.

6/01/2010.

Stubby #1. Me: Pours well, offers bland dry biscuit flavours. Otherwise faultless. Mum: “There’s not much flavour.” Post sniff, swirl, spit.. The rest is sinkward bound.

Stubby #2. Me: As per stubby #1. Mum: “This tastes the same, is it?” Same deal; sniff, swirl, spit, sink. If I wanted something bland, expensive and useless I’d buy Corona.

Stubby #3. Before I said anything, in chimed mum: “This one’s different.” Me: Pours slightly cloudier than first two. Smells of pear and barley husk. Malty, rich creamy palate, accentuated by nice florals.  This is crisp and dry, with delightful summer fruits and florals. Sniff, swirl, spit, polish the rest off with glee.

Still no solution. When you get a good one, it’s like someone put Knappstein reserve on a diet and made it sessionable. Lovely.

7/10 Update

Stubby #4 Sabe al Corona, Senor! Ole! Siguienti por favor….

Stubby #5 As above.

One lurks for a Friday night knock off beer. But will it live upto expectations?

Grand Ridge Brewery Gippsland Gold Pale Ale

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009
Gippsland Gold

Gippsland Gold

I have spent an awful lot of time shitcanning Grand Ridge Brewery. A brewery that is unquestionably the most egotistical and unrealistic in existance. They have committed more crimes against flavour than a city of Mr Baldys ever could against children.

However, I must admit – This current “Gippsland Gold” Pale Ale is delicious. Pale ale it is not. It’s quite obviously red in color and red in flavour profile, so again like most Grand Ridge beers it lies on the label. BUT….. the beer is freakin’ delicious.

It pours superbly, maintains it’s fine head, the nose is stupendously good! Enticing fruits lurk below husky malt, the carbonation is cleansing and consistent. The palate is full bodied, rich & creamy malt driven style which finishes with a delightful dry hoppy and fruity flourish. It’s a wonderful, wonderful beer.  3, 6.5, 8.5. 18/20 4.9% Alc./Vol.

The person that actually dared to suggest I try one was the inimitable Tony Evans of Mayerling Cellars. Talk beer with him until the cows come home, but please, do not buy any serious wine from that place. They have a terrible, terrible problem with the heat in that shop. I was in there today, a 39 degree day today and everything on the shop floor is roasted.


2008 Crown Ambassador Reserve Lager

Sunday, November 8th, 2009
2008 Crown Ambassador Reserve Lager

2008 Crown Ambassador Reserve Lager

There’s quite a fuss made about this stuff. The packaging and presentation really is superb. They (Fosters) sure as shit make you pay for it though. This stuff retails for around $70 per bottle when it’s released. This is the first release, but they’ve done another one since. I’ve not yet tried it. The marketing hype prattles on about the cellarability of this beer, and the fact it’s strong, and made from fresh hop flowers. The fact is, the Belgians have been making this style of beer for centuries – what’s more, they’re still doing it! I’m amused by Fosters calling it a “Lager.”

Pours a deep, near opaque amber colour with ample, fine, off white head, which dissipates quicker than it should. Fine white lacing remains, however. I find the carbonation just borders on acceptable. Manuka honey, multi-grain toast, and raisins on the nose. It’s rich, generous and inviting. The palate is big, rich and warming. Delivering intense flavours of raisin toast, golden syrup and nutri-grain. There’s an appealing hint of vegemite running through the palate. Not normally something I’d call appealing, but it provides contrast against the onslaught of sweet honey, dried fruits and grain. The finish is a disappointment, soft and soapy, the flavours fading into insignificance without so much as a wave goodbye. An exceedingly good attempt at the Belgian dubbel/tripel style. Wax covered crown seal. Alc/Vol not on bottle, I suspect around 9%. Bottle 4354 Tasted. 2, 6, 6. 14/20.

Works for me because it’s flavours are golden, on the verge of brown, I find it more drinkable than a Westmalle for example. However, at $80, I could have a dozen Belgians that are infinitely superior beers; Ambassador Reserve isn’t any better than Chimay Blue, Chimay Red, Westmalle, Delerium, Hoegaarden Grand Cru, Hoegaarden Forbidden Fruit, Orval.

I still insist Cooper’s Vintage is a superior beer to all of those above. Here’s a review I did a while ago of the 1999 Coopers Vintage. I had one a month or so ago, the stuff is still in very fine form.

http://schitzengiggles.net/wp/2008/10/booze-zaks/

Hawthorn Brewing Co. Premium Pale Ale

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009
Hawthorn Brewing Co. Premium Pale Ale

Hawthorn Brewing Co. Premium Pale Ale

The label got me. Bigtime. “Imported from Hawthorn.” I loled, I bought, I conquered. Well, the marketing department conquered. But good on ‘em.

This beer pours very well. Clear, dull amber, with a fine white head, excellent persistence,  and very good, sustained carbonation. Simple, sweet, malty nose, featuring, citrus, cereal and honey above some flowers drying on the far wall, the floral nuances are very subtle. Clean and simple, but very appealing. The palate is medium bodied and features generous flavours that accurately mirror the nose. Clean, drying finish. Lengthy lemon rind, malt and honey aftertaste. A very respectable session beer. One that will keep me amused for quite some time. Get on board. 3, 6, 7. 16/20. 4.7% Alc./Vol.